samsung

...now browsing by tag

 
android apple app store branding browser business business strategy commerce communication content strategy customer Data data usage design ebay firefox Global google groupon hotel photos innovation iphone marketing microsoft Mobile mobile advertising mobile devices monetization office oyster.com prioritization productivity product management product manager product strategy project management reviews samsung Search sensors smartphone software Strategy value virtual goods
 

Are Users Aware They are Running Android?

Tuesday, January 18th, 2011

Android’s strategy is to provide both hardware and software diversity to spread Android globally and quickly. So far, it’s working.   A hardware diversity strategy for non-niche markets (greater than 300M units) works – Microsoft used this successfully in the PC market.  The question remains whether software diversity is a good long-term strategy for Android.  Are they building brand loyalty and experience lock-in that will stand the test of time.

(1) Users don’t know  they are carrying an Android powered device.

As part of Gigwalk recruitment we ask users to provide us with the type of phone they own.  Here is the exact wording of the question

If you don’t own an iPhone, what kind of operating system is your device running?

That means that the vast majority of users don’t know they are using an Android device.  I was curious so I dug deeper and asked some users who did not include the term Android in describing their phone what they thought Android was and here are some of the responses I got:

  • Android is a place to buy apps
  • Android is a specific kind of phone (but I don’t have one)

(2) No Experience Lock-In

Longer term this software diversity strategy hampers Google’s ability to lock-in users to the Android platform.  One of the last remaining ways to lock-in users over extended period of times is experience lock-in. Getting a user to switch from Windows to Mac is hard as most don’t want to re-learn how to use an operating system – that is experience lock-in. The same thing will happen for mobile operating systems; as users develop gesture muscle memory around common mobile tasks (calling, texting, emailing, photos, etc.) they are not going to eagerly switch devices.  By inviting hardware partners to customize the Android UI (e.g. HTC Sense) they are introducing software diversity into the ecosystem.  This software diversity means their are no consistent experiences across Android devices.  When a user upgrades their device switching from their HTC Incredible (Android device) to a Samsung Galaxy (another Android device) or Windows Phone is nearly as much relearning work for the user.

Posted in Mobile, Strategy | 1 Response »
Tags: , , ,

The Mobile Hardware Diversity Strategy

Friday, January 14th, 2011
Recently Marco Arment made the point that Android suffers from too much hardware choice.  This is really an argument against the hardware diversity strategy.  I have purchased two iPhones and will likely purchase another one in the future.  Yet, to argue against the hardware diversity strategy is a mistake. Here’s why:
  1. 5 Billion Mobile Subscribers
    • Ultimately all 5 billions of these subscribers will be buying a smartphone. Some people will buy two so it could be more. While I really like my iPhone, in a market of this size a lot of people won’t agree.  Some won’t like its price, others its size, , some won’t buy because of a missing feature(s), and the list goes on . I think you will be hard pressed to find a non-niche market (>300 million units) in the tech consumer space where a single product dominates.
  2. Calling a Game in the 1st Inning
    • The smartphone revolution has only started — their are only a few hundred million devices out there.  Drawing conclusions on the hardware diversity strategy at this stage is like calling a baseball game in the 1st inning with the score 2-1.  The hardware diversity strategy takes many years to fully play out.
    • To suggest that the hardware accessory market won’t develop because of hardware diversity seems is wrong.  Samsung sold 10M Galaxy Android devices in about six months and the accessory vendors jumped on board.
  3. Big Bang vs. Constant Drumbeat
    • iPhone takes the big bang approach to marketing.  A single big launch every year a frenzied build-up. For most people who don’t follow technology that big Apple event quickly fades from memory after a day or two – they simply don’t keep this stuff top of mind.  Whereas the marketing power of Android and Windows Phone is a constant drumbeat in TV, web, radio, billboards, etc.  The aggregate marketing spend of the hardware vendor, mobile OS provider, and carrier is going to be huge.
  4. How People Buy Phones
    • How techies buy phones is very different then normal people. Head to a Verizon or AT&T store in Waukegan, IL and watch how normal people buy phones.  That will give you a sense of how normal people make phone purchasing decisions.  If they see a huge and sexy Windows Phone display and the sales guy is talking up the Windows Phones’, normals are going to play around with a few of the Windows Phones and buy one of them.

    Additionally, Android and Windows Phone are not using the exact same strategies.  Android is taking a hardware AND software diversity strategy – they allow their hardware partners to layer on custom user experiences.  This is a dangerous long term strategy as users never mentally develop brand affinity towards a single user experience.  Whereas, Microsoft is only employing a hardware diversity strategy, and even there its taking on a slightly different form than Android.  Specifically, Windows Phone hardware specs are very strict compared to Android.

    Posted in Mobile, Strategy | No Responses »
    Tags: , ,